On Wednesday 06 May 2009 20:30:11 xor wrote: > On Wednesday 06 May 2009 17:29:15 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > Network performance cost? Well, what would be the impact of not scheduling > > by retry count any more? I dunno, any opinions? > > > > Stuff like WoT and Freetalk will do *many* requests for stuff which might not > have been inserted yet, I don't think that it would be wise if those requests > were sent over and over again without increasing the delay between the > retries... if that is what your suggestion means?
No. They would still be limited to 3 requests every half hour. The difference is that right now we try not to re-request the same key if there are other keys to fetch which we haven't tried as many times to fetch (we waive this for the first 3 attempts). I propose to abolish this: some blocks will end up being fetched more than others, but it will average out. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090507/549b0e7b/attachment.pgp>
