On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Florent Daigni?re <nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote: > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2009-05-30 11:55:17]: [....] >> - Database-backed PHP for MANTIS. I don't think we should get rid of MANTIS. > > I do think we should; three main reasons: > ? ? ? ?- mantis is just not adapted to our usage anymore (We don't have > ? ? ? ? ?one single tree anymore) > ? ? ? ?- most reported bugs don't apply > ? ? ? ?- It's really a high-maintenance cost application... > ? ? ? ? ?Administrating mantis, patching it, keeping it up to date is a > PITA > > What about using github's issue tracking thingy instead? >
GitHub's issue tracking thingy don't even handle dependency of bugs, no real categories (just tags), no milestone thing, no release management... --- this is even worse then what MANTIS has. Most of the github users use LightHouse (http://lighthouseapp.com/), but I have not used it either... Anybody have experience with hosted bug trackers?
