On Saturday 29 August 2009 18:11:31 Ximin Luo wrote:
> New build:
> 
> http://cloud.github.com/downloads/freenet/contrib-staging/freenet-ext.27-pre6-5-g23bd9ff.jar
> 
> This one includes 64-bit FEC binaries for windows x64. It has been tested on
> windows XP 64-bit with both 32-bit and 64-bit Sun JVMs, and on Debian 
> GNU/Linux
> squeeze/sid with a 64-bit openJDK JVM.
> 
> To run it on a 64-bit JVM on windows, point wrapper.conf to the exact path of
> 64-bit java.exe - wrapper will take simply "java" to mean the 32-bit java.exe,
> since the wrapper is itself 32-bit. You'll get an "Attempting to deploy Native
> FEC for win32-x86_64" message in your wrapper.log if you've set it up right.
> 
> The FreeBSD-x86 binary has not been recompiled wiht the latest changes, but
> should still work (no JNI ABI changes were made).
> 
> X

New slightly more official build, includes the above plus changes since (mostly 
portability issues):

http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-ext.27pre7.jar
> 
> Ximin Luo wrote:
> > latest version in contrib fixes these crashes on my machine
> > 
> > http://cloud.github.com/downloads/freenet/contrib-staging/freenet-ext.27-pre6-4-gbe60d2f.jar
> > 
> > please test it.
> > 
> > X
> > 
> > Ximin Luo wrote:
> >> just reproduced this myself on a 64bit windows xp with a 32bit JVM, with 
> >> the
> >> exact same error. should be able to debug it a bit quicker now.
> > 
> >> X
> > 
> >> Ximin Luo wrote:
> >>> #  EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=0x69141741, pid=328, 
> >>> tid=5424
> >>> siginfo: ExceptionCode=0xc0000005, reading address 0x00000000
> >>>
> >>> libfec8.dll:
> >>> 6914173e: 8b 55 dc                mov    -0x24(%ebp),%edx
> >>> 69141741: 03 02                   add    (%edx),%eax
> >>> 69141743: 89 07                   mov    %eax,(%edi)
> >>>
> >>> This corresponds to
> >>>
> >>> fec8-jinterf.c:
> >>> 170:        inarr[i] += localDataOff[i];
> >>>
> >>> with i=0, on the first run of the loop (which has been unrolled), and
> >>>
> >>> %edi points to inarr
> >>> %eax has the same value as inarr[0]
> >>> -0x24(%ebp) points to localDataOff
> >>>
> >>> The register dump has EDX=0x00000000, so localDataOff is a null pointer, 
> >>> but
> >>> code earlier on in the function should prevent this:
> >>>
> >>> libfec8.dll:
> >>> 6914133c: 89 45 dc                mov    %eax,-0x24(%ebp)
> >>> 6914133f: 83 c4 10                add    $0x10,%esp
> >>> 69141342: 85 c0                   test   %eax,%eax
> >>> 69141344: 0f 84 02 01 00 00       je     6914144c <RETURN>
> >>>
> >>> fec8-jinterf.c:
> >>> 147:    if (localDataOff == NULL) {
> >>> 148:        return;  /* exception occured */
> >>> 149:    }
> >>>
> >>> and it's a local variable so can't be affected by other threads.
> >>>
> >>> also the register dump has: ESP=0x207dfa04, EBP=0x207df9f8; EBP < ESP 
> >>> should
> >>> not be happening on windows...
> >>>
> >>> The only thing I can think of is that the JNI function PushLocalFrame is
> >>> screwing with the EBP register, for some reason...
> >>>
> >>> Can you try running this on 32-bit windows?
> >>>
> >>> X
> >>>
> >>> Ximin Luo wrote:
> >>>> Can you run it several more times and attach some more hs_err logs?
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, do you have any other JVMs you can try this on? Preferably
> >>>> 32-JVM-on-64-OS ones.
> >>>>
> >>>> X
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090905/2e360356/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to