This is risky. Unlike updating over the freenet network, it's not secure at all and it's not automatic.
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Ximin Luo <infinity0 at gmx.com> wrote: > On 31/07/10 18:32, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >> The fundamental, irresolvable problem with worrying about the FHS is that >> we >> need to be able to update our own executable code. Hence Freenet is >> installed under a single user, binaries, logs, and everything else. This >> is >> true now by accident or design on unix, and it will be true on Windows >> very >> soon as well because of nasty installer issues with trying to make it a >> service. >> > > I can go set up a freenet APT repository, it's really simple and requires no > extra daemon, just static HTTP files. (After we get this directory structure > sorted out and some build-deb scripts, of course.) That will take care of > the auto-update issue on Debian and Ubuntu. > > X > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
