On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Marco A. Calamari <marcoc1 at dada.it> wrote:
> > Our funding is running pretty low so I'd really like to get some kind > > of major announcement out in the next week or two, and it would be > > great if a public FreeTalk release could be part of that. > > Just my two cents; I'm the first to be happy for a new major > release ... especially one that doesn't need a reset of > Freenet ... ;) > > But put hurry on developement is, in my experience, always > a bad idea, if not absolutely necessary. > Well, I'm not so-much trying to put a hurry on development, as to get some kind of time estimate. Bear in mind that FreeTalk was somewhat usable almost 9 months ago (you could post and read messages), and yet there is still no public release after all that time. That isn't exactly what I'd describe as hurrying :-) > For example; the Freenet Project officially support > Wikileaks and push & maintain a mirror of it in Freenet. > > Chances are that such announce will have more coverage > that a major Freenet release. And it will be one > "Right Thing to do", also (IMHO, of course). > Yes, I think it would be beneficial to get a wikileaks mirror up again in Freenet, but of course the project itself can't do it (since that would make us responsible for its content). Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, SenseArray Email: ian at sensearray.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100822/5b2dea47/attachment.html>
