On Tuesday 09 February 2010 23:30:03 Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:20 PM, xor <xor at gmx.li> wrote: > > On Saturday 06 February 2010 23:16:20 Ian Clarke wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 1:03 PM, xor <xor at gmx.li> wrote: > > > > New UI? Huh? What is it supposed to be? A fproxy theme? > > > > > > No, it will be based on GWT, and it will run along-side FProxy. It will > > > not provide all the functionality of FProxy, the primary goal is to > > > > provide > > > > > a user-friendly interface for "casual" users. > > > > So you are talking about the web-pushing branch from SoC? > > It may use some of that code, but it won't be based on that. >
Well, it wouldn't be wise to throw away the code if you're planning to do something based on GWT because web-pushing is already based on it :| Who is supposed to implement it if it should be new? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100210/ed72f8de/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100210/ed72f8de/attachment.pgp>
