On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org > wrote:
> On Friday 12 February 2010 03:17:16 Ian Clarke wrote: > > You're suggesting that we dramatically increase the amount of work > involved > > in creating any new UI to cater to the irrationally paranoid. I don't > > agree. > > I don't see why it increases the amount of work involved by more than a > trivial amount. > > Perhaps you could explain what part of the essential, visible functionality > of e.g. http://www.google.com/ requires Javascript to function? > None of it, and if all we were implementing was a bare-bones search engine, you'd have a point. But we also have to implement real-time notifications, a discussion system, page loading status indicators, and all manner of other things - so your analogy is completely inappropriate. > *Nothing* in the mockup requires Javascript I've said this several times already, apparently I need to say it again: The mockup shows only a tiny fraction of the functionality we need. Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, SenseArray Email: ian at sensearray.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100212/a1494222/attachment.html>
