On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote:
> 4) Capacity. IMHO if Freenet is working well we should not need insert on > demand: Its capacity should be much greater than it is now, and we should be > able to just insert and fetch the data. Actually, I'm not completely convinced this is a problem. At present, I believe most of our data persistence issues stem from node churn, not blocks falling out of individual stores. Right now that's just a (somewhat justified) hunch, but I have sufficient data to investigate in more detail. Evan
