On Friday 05 March 2010 15:19:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > the server side of web pushing does not depend on HTMLNode heavily,
> > and it will be a relatively easy task to migrate it to another base.
> > As only a few UpdateableElements present yet, it shouldn't take more
> > than a day of work. I'll be skiing for a week from today, so I can
> > look at the new templating stuff 2 weeks from now.
> Okay great, we'll merge Bombe's stuff and then let sashee update it before
> merging web-pushing.
I do get the feeling that you largely underestimate what has to be done to rid
Fred of HTMLNode and introduce a template engine. Practically everything in
freenet.clients.http.* needs to be refactored, in fact it would probably be
easier to just nuke it and rewrite it from scratch. :)
I am currently still in the process of rewriting Freetalk's web interface to
use the template engine and yes, I did rewrite it completely from scratch
because adapting the existing code is a nightmare as HTMLNode goes way too
deep to be able to change existing code with a reasonable amount of effort.
I don't know when the Freetalk web interface is finished because my free time
is currently limited. The template engine still lacks a couple of features
that I plan to implement (which will happen during the Freetalk adaption) so I
would advise against prematurely integrating it into Fred.
David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100307/c2d44c90/attachment.pgp>
