On Tuesday 09 March 2010 22:21:10 xor wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 21:55:55 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > This message is signed with my new gpg key. This is used for my emails and
> > for signing many downloads. The old key frequently got bad signature errors
> > because it was set to use SHA1 but it was using SHA256 as per my config
> > (since SHA1 is known broken). Please could somebody who has been seeing bad
> > signatures verify this one? Thanks.
>
> After it has confirmed to work please tell us where we can get a copy of the
> new key which is signed by the old one...
>
The signature should be on the key on the key servers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100310/63c0b8c1/attachment.pgp>
