On 28/10/10 19:20, Robert Hailey wrote: > I would agree if this issue was "holding freenet back", but I don't get > that impression at all.
but what would qualify as "holding freenet back", for you? > (1) There are still many capable but PPC Apple machines being used. how many people use such machines exclusively? > (2) Foreseeable interests exists that would be easier with java-5 (like > embedded-freenet). by the time we get a good effort going in this area, java 6 will probably be ok for such use-cases... > (3) There is no stated immediate benefit. ...so nothing in my previous email counts? why not? > (4) It would require a lot more effort on my part to keep up with a > java-5-compatible freenet fork. this will be a worst-case scenario. i can imagine that lots more people (than just freenet users) want java 6 on mac, which means sooner rather than later, it will happen. X -- GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE
