These are good ideas Steve, I must confess that I've been a little
distracted lately - and we do definitely need to get our act together on
funding.  Matthew, what is our current "drop-dead" date as best as you can
estimate it?

Ian.

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Steve Dougherty <steve at asksteved.com>wrote:

> The project's current state is reflected in a dollar amount of remaining
> project funds, along with an estimate of how much additional development
> time
> it corresponds to. This amount will decrease suddenly and significantly
> when a
> payment is made. It's not - at least supposed to be - a secret that the
> Freenet
> project is set to run out of funds mid-September. I've mentioned to people
> - on
> Sone, in #freenet - that the project is running out of funds and they had
> no
> idea. This is a problem. I propose (in decreasing importance) that:
>
> 1) The donation page mention _when_ the last ~2-month payment was made.
>    - Or ideally, that the time remaining estimate include remaining
>    funded development time. This need not be exact: it would allow the
>    estimate to decrease gradually instead of in sudden chunks.
>
> 2) Fundraising be presented as drives for a month's worth of funding.
>    - This would allow donating to have goals, and be framed as increasing
>    toward something tangible, (a month of development) rather than building
> up
>    funds against sudden, quiet decrease.
>    - The estimate ceases to be meaningful if it sits at "8 days" for two
>    months.
>
> 3) Release announcements include statements on the project's current
> financial
> state and how to donate.
>    - Fred could have integrated release announcements for greater
> visibility.
>    These could of course be disabled by the user.
>
> 4) Release announcements also be displayed on the freenetproject.orghomepage
> in something akin to the "Latest Releases"/"News" sidebar on winehq.org.
>    - Having only news posts that are several months old makes the project
>    appear inactive, which it is not.
>
> It should go without saying that a 0.8 release would probably make good
> press,
> assuming it can be made stable before funding runs out.
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>



-- 
Ian Clarke
Personal blog: http://blog.locut.us/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110829/79bd2904/attachment.html>

Reply via email to