Errr... sorry it probably helps if I read the message correctly, rather than assuming that what I read is what you wrote. Please ignore the rumblings of the babbling idiot that can't read.
-----Original Message----- From: Matthew Toseland [mailto:t...@amphibian.dyndns.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 3:34 PM To: devl at freenetproject.org Cc: Bill Ritchie Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Please test the new load management branch On Wednesday 02 February 2011 18:53:58 Bill Ritchie wrote: > Hmm.. You can't switch to the test network from the web interface? Also is > there any way to see that you are on the test network, and if it's working > correctly? Any tests that we should run???? I see that I now have a test > network port. Does that need to be forwarded or have the firewall opened up? As I said, there isn't a testnet yet. However it might be helpful for people to test the new code. > > Questions, Questions, Questions.... > > -----Original Message----- > From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org > [mailto:devl-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Toseland > Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 7:42 PM > To: devl at freenetproject.org > Cc: support at freenetproject.org > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Please test the new load management branch > > On Sunday 30 January 2011 00:30:09 Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Please get the snapshot (update.cmd testing / update.sh testing), and test > > it. I want to know if it causes serious problems, and also any other bugs > > you run into. I know there will be various errors, but I am still > > interested in the more severe ones. > > > > For people building from source: > > The tag is: testing-build-1340-maybe-merge-new-load-management-pre1 > > The branch is: merge-new-load-management The git rev is > > 47edfe611a1f088b51fccb36d3e7710e28c3d2b8 (that commit does matter despite > > it appearing to be a logging fix). > > > > THANKS! > > > More detail on the Frost post, basically if you can run both nodes on the > main network and maybe some parallel darknet test-network as well, that'd be > incredibly awesome (turn on all the cache-absolutely-everything options to > make a small network work). Feel free to exchange noderefs over IRC, email, > and FMS, in complete violation of normal rules about such things; if we don't > release new load management soon, and possibly even if we do, I will probably > reinstate the testnet network. > > [00:35:21] * toad_ posted appeal for new load management testers on FMS > [00:35:39] * toad_ needs both test-network testing and real-network testing, > feel free to get involved in both forms [00:35:51] <TheSeeker> o.? [16:33.57] > <Flatron_55> Pong reply to " 33.20 " from TheSeeker at xx:33:43 [00:35:54] > <toad_> and to exchange noderefs over FMS and do other silly foolish things > to get the network up [00:36:05] <toad_> it's a test network remember? > [00:36:05] <toad_> :) > [00:36:17] <toad_> my test nodes are running on the main network > [00:36:40] <toad_> i suggest testers with reasonable bandwidth run one > or more main network nodes and also one or more test network nodes > [00:37:20] * toad_ is aiming to release new load management *EARLY* > next week if possible, so any efforts over the next 48 hours could be > very helpful _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
