-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 12.02.2011 01:43, schrieb Matthew Toseland: > On Friday 11 Feb 2011 21:39:34 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> On Saturday 05 February 2011 18:39:49 Matthew Toseland wrote: >>> We need more seednodes. I will explain the broader situation below. If you >>> can run a seednode - which means you need a forwarded port, a reasonably >>> static IP address (or dyndns name), and a reasonable amount of bandwidth >>> (especially upstream), and a reasonably stable node, please send me your >>> opennet noderef (from the strangers page in advanced mode), and enable "Be >>> a seednode" in the advanced config. Thanks. >> >> How much upstream do I need exactly? >> >> I can offer about 50kB/s (damn asymmetric DSL?), dyndns is no problem. > > That's what I used to use when I was a seednode. It's a bit painful but it > works.
My seednode is running with 64kB/s,.. so not much more. And it is not always using up its bandwidth. So I would say it should be sufficient. artur -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNVkVFAAoJEMCbH/uYbXaWzdoIAK/Ht2Pl1IqHeeA4KuH8jxMy 101YmTGJarlivGGe6P5uff2dW6tLEUXzVbqWPplWYNgCywnkjrFH96rPlr3UIm8C ODwzZspx5+NFQ0VSqbnC3kLo+tOnfJhXfvutEug+VtPNp5PJrdRmvbe47q4JtJhc uA5JqdgTtOlHo1/GG6QikYudl1cmnOFFGW/Xm2NYTjcE3tzGkD5AlAnapWCV9xlK f63pYBW/hx5aFf9AJE26uyOc/CiRIhF1mk09WzSW8z3BP9w8GVyr8V9PoeO+P6O5 AAKPTEKUmzJaP+i/x+XcoqFgGAT+1Vyur4MFlxkUk/UMDHYKBPXS3OQ551bEe98= =wygc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
