In the past when we have accepted odd kinds of donations we have had a small 
number/amount of such donations, in exchange for cluttering the donate page and 
maybe costing us because of that. We could probably do it in such a way as to 
avoid clutter though - have the big buttons for paypal and google and then a 
link to other options maybe?

Technically, I regard bitcoin as rather fascinating, although:
1) It is not strongly anonymous. All transactions are public, and until 
somebody implements a mixing layer, coins can be traced in a similar manner to 
Freenet correlation attacks. On the other hand, arguably this is a *GOOD* thing 
as it means it's less likely to cause problems.
2) When I last looked the exchange services take a rather huge spread, so it's 
not a very efficient mechanism. However that was a couple of months back.
3) Personally I will not run a coin generating node, although I have no problem 
with running a non-minting node, because I object to systems that require 
spending a percentage (admittedly a declining percentage) of your total 
currency supply on electricity doing little useful work.

Two users have asked about this, attached.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: ma...@anikin.us
Subject: [freenet-support] Bitcoin
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 09:06:15 -0500
Size: 3341
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110216/f6f10614/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: cyclon...@safe-mail.net
Subject: [freenet-support] Bitcoin donation
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:30:12 -0800
Size: 8161
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110216/f6f10614/attachment-0001.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110216/f6f10614/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to