On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:10:56 +0200 xor <xor at gmx.li> wrote: > Is there any problem with 2 channels besides the inefficiency? > Can't we just ignore the problem given that it is very unlikely to happen? > > The channels will have a finite timeout of some days or so anyway according > to > what we discussed in the initial meeting, right? So the situation will fix > itself after some time if it ever happens.
Seems I've been thinking inside that infamous box :/ Having 2 channels is perfectly fine, so that solves it. Thanks :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110707/bbee9518/attachment.pgp>
