Thank you all who supported and commented on my illustrations. How about we direct the user to / show a link to the current set-up when scripts are disabled?
Okay, and thats fine. So go ahead and start building it for modern browsers then? Regards, Irfan. On 6 August 2012 10:40, Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > On Sunday 05 Aug 2012 17:20:09 Ian Clarke wrote: >> These look good, although of course it will be critically important that we >> get the text right, since it's essential that people understand what risks >> they are taking. > > One specific difficulty is everyone is going to choose "Maximum Security" (or > "High Security" if we don't offer max). IMHO we need it to be clear - before > the user actually clicks a button - that you can't use High Security unless > you know people already on Freenet. >> >> I think it's ok to just support reasonably recent versions of Internet >> Explorer, even Google doesn't support IE7. >> >> I personally think it is fine to require JavaScript be enabled, but I know >> that others disagree. > > I don't think a non-javascript fallback will be a problem. >> >> Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Regards, Irfan Mir.
