I recall seeing a tweet linking to it, but I don't seem to be able to locate it right now. Probably deleted or a Twitter-hickup.
However, the fact that nextgens is at DEF CON may have more effect wrt `dissemination'. See `thread': https://twitter.com/thedarktangent/status/357514366020624386 Cheers, Thomas On 18-07-13 21:39, Ian Clarke wrote: > Did this response actually get to the Defcon folks? > > Ian. > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Matthew Toseland < > toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > >> On Wednesday 17 Jul 2013 18:07:45 Crypto Nation wrote: >>> Spam detection software, running on the system "freenetproject.org", has >>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>> the administrator of that system for details. >>> >>> Content preview: Posted to FMS by stats at Neu9ks-39mEjep~gV7tJe... on >> 2013-07-02 >>> this statistic is a view of one freenet node scanning freenet >> openpeers file >>> every minute collect IP addresses from physical.udp field ASNum >> Edition : >>> GEO-117 20130702 Build 1 ASNum V6 Edition : GEO-117 20130306 Build 1 >> Country >>> Edition : GEO-106 20130514 Build 1 Country V6 Edition: GEO-106 >> 20130604 Build >>> 1 [...] >>> >>> Content analysis details: (5.8 points, 5.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- >> -------------------------------------------------- >>> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail >> provider >>> (cryptonation[at]gmail.com) >>> (cryptonation[at]gmail.com) >>> (cryptonation[at]gmail.com) >>> 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is >>> CUSTOM_MED >>> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >>> 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% >>> [score: 0.5000] >>> 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not >> necessarily valid >>> 3.0 NOT_SIGNED_BUT_EXPECTED Message should have been signed by DKIM but >>> wasn't >>> 2.0 FREENET_LOC_SHORT Contains short body and URI >>> 1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid >>> -1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list >>> >>> The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to >>> open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, >>> or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view >>> it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor. >>> >> How can Google have messed up their mail config this badly? Surely this is >> a problem on our side? >> >> This was not a spam, it was cryptonation trying to be helpful in response >> to a tweet from the DefCon folks. >> >> Granted he should have sent it as plain text. >> >> How can we fix this? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devl mailing list >> Devl at freenetproject.org >> https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >> > >
