Isn't that a blocking lock? That's not allowed in an `ET_NET` thread. If you're going to do a blocking lock at all, it would be better to do that on the original lock. Beyond that, this will call the handler of the continuation without a lock on the continuation's mutex, which is precisely what this PR is trying to prevent. Again, if it's OK to do that, why bother with any of this?
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/4136 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
