> But that is again a problem for the future.
> 
> So in conclusion: I'll drop the serdes from the API, and forward from the 
> source KTable instead. We should then be able to resume the review of this 
> PR, right?

Yup, thanks!



> But I do think that we can still optimize it to avoid the extra changelog.

Yeah I'm not married to my approach, so I'm all ears if you do already have 
some concrete ideas :)

[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5567 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]

Reply via email to