@npeltier
I already tried with .acls('allow') or .acls('deny') but api expect conf
params to be even in number so went with similar implementation as done in
Authorizable pipe
-https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/sling-pipes/writers.html
.acls('authorizable','true') can be changed to simply .acls() but I thought of
differentiating between the use case when only the acls under authorizable node
has to be put or the acls of authorizable on the repository has to be put in
bindings based on authorizable is true or not
let me know your thought on it ,
Thanks,
Dinesh
[ Full content available at:
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-pipes/pull/6 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]