Ah, I guess this is "K-in" and "K-out"? I think a more common pattern in the code base is `<K,V,KR,VR>` (r=result) or `<K,V,K1,V1>` (not sure what the rationale there is ;) ).
That said, there's no reason generics should get to be alphabet soup when the project style prohibits alphabet soup variable names. Feel free to use (short) descriptive names for these types if you feel the "standard" ones are too opaque. Even `KIn` and `KOut` would be better than replacing one arcane pattern with another. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5273 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
