> Integrity is a part of security, not "security" if you ask me. If I only give > you integrity, it is not "secure". That is what I'm implying.
Okay. That's not how I would use those terms, but I now understand what you were saying. Thanks for clarifying. Hopefully you understood where I was coming from also (using integrity as a type of security, and not a component of security). Semantics of "security" now hopefully resolved, I'm still concerned about the removal of an enforcement of an integrity "best-practice". What is the use case/driving force for removing this enforcement? [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/646 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
