[GitHub] [beam] charlesccychen commented on pull request #6349: [BEAM-2687] Implement State over the Fn API

Wed, 19 Sep 2018 01:53:40 -0700 

Should we name this something else (maybe `FnApiUserStateContext`?) to 
differentiate it from the base?

[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6349 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]

Reply via email to