Yes, having one is the eventual goal. The FnAPI runner doesn't yet fully support streaming yet though.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 2:44 PM Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote: > @robertwb <https://github.com/robertwb> thanks for the ping. I did not > pay attention to fn_api_runner so far - this gives a good idea for the > wiring work we need to do for user state and timers in the Flink runner. > Just curious, why do we have a direct runner and an fn_api_runner for > Python, why not just have the latter? Or perhaps that is the (undocumented) > goal? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6433#issuecomment-422788463>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAdqgYpxLTzSlgMYMEK49ln_X3ZU3KHSks5ucjxGgaJpZM4WvmMo> > . > [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6433 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
