I assume this is in reference to 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7435.
Just jotting down some thoughts: if this were iface/impl, all the state would 
be private, and there'd be no need for the `protected` copy constructor.

But if we decide we like KAFKA-7435, we'd apply it to all the config objects, 
and converting this one would be low incremental cost.

I'm :+1: for defaulting to the common pattern.

[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5709 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]

Reply via email to