This computation makes use of the fact that this reference is a `ContextualRecord<byte[]>`, the value type is generic in ContextualRecord. Of course, this is the only usage of that class, so, I could just build the `byte[]` value type into ContextualRecord.
But I'm slightly in favor of keeping it as-is so we can use ContextualRecord in other contexts where we need both the value (not serialized) and the context in the future. WDYT? [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5693 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
