> the idea of the patch was to keep the supervisor in a state similar to what > it would have been in if it were stuck in the current lifecycle start, while > allowing the rest of the lifecycle to start
Got it. Makes sense. The reason I commented about `InitNotice` was, I'm not sure `initializationExec` is needed. Maybe we can use `scheduledExec` instead and cancel the scheduledFuture once `tryInit` succeeds? Or we can submit a runnable task to `exec` which calls `RetryUtils.retry()`. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/pull/6383 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
