My apologies for not being clear before. I agree with you that I'm in favor of the approach you have here as it's more clear what is going on. My original point was I favor the conciseness of a single `Joined` parameter, but it's easier to create a regression (which my PR did), so I vote to pass three parameters to `repartitionForJoin`.
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5741 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for devnull@infra.apache.org
