nit: "replica" is the copy itself, i.e. the data, not the process doing the 
replication. Compare with "slave", which is the process not the data, so these 
terms aren't quite interchangeable. I think "follower" is more appropriate when 
talking about a process vs the data, as follower implies an agent of some sort 
(as does slave). Or maybe something like "replica process".

In a couple places you've substituted replica for slave, which I think changes 
the meaning slightly.

[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5653 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]

Reply via email to