On 9/9/07, Sergiu Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/5/07, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What we could do is have a version like 1.0-1.1 (<xeclipse>-<XE>) but that > > sounds way way too complex. > > > > I think I prefer simply documenting it on xwiki.org and inside XEclipse > > itself. It should check the XE version it's connecting to and tell the user > > if it's not compatible with it IMO. > > > > WDYT? > > > > +1 > > XEclipse is a distinct project, with its own releases. Documenting the > dependencies should suffice. > > Sergiu
Fair enough. Like I said, it sounded sort of silly to me as well-- I was just wondering if making it more explicit would be useful. I use the xwiki version + a unique minor to keep track of extensions/patches I maintain for our install.. that way it will be clear when what I'm working on moves to 1.1, but what I've got is not standalone-- it's a patched xwiki installation.. -- 'Waste of a good apple' -Samwise Gamgee _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
