Hi, We cannot not have a version increase, as it is the only way to really be able to make a diff between 2 versions. However we have 2 fields that are not much used right now, called Content Update Date, and Content Update User.
For all changes not relating to content, we should not modify these. This applies for comments, tags. Also, with the minor version feature introduced by Artem, we should make comment additiona automatically a minor version. Ludovic Vincent Massol a écrit : > (resending - I sent it on the 6th to the wrong OW dev list...) > > >> If we don't increase version then how is it going to appear in the >> history view. Namely, how would you see that a comment has been added? >> >> Of course we would still need to send notifications even when >> comments are added. >> >> This is a general question about objects attached to a document. As >> of now I'm not sure we should treat some objects differently than >> others. >> >> Just to step back and play the devil, why is it bad that document >> version is increased when comments are added? >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >> On Aug 24, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is more a matter of opinions. Should a comment increase the >>> version of a document? I'd say yes, but the view of simple users is >>> that a comment should not affect the document, as it is something >>> describing the document, not belonging to the document. So we should >>> have a parameter that configures this. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> Sergiu >>> -- >>> http://purl.org/net/sergiu >>> > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > -- Ludovic Dubost Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
