Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Jan 19, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Your XEN ICT Team - Ricardo Rodriguez  
> wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please, why Novell LDAP classes for Java ldap.jar has been renamed as
>> ldap-UNKNONW.jar in XWiki distributions?
>>     
>
> Simply because when I renamed all jars to follow the maven naming  
> conventions I wasn't able to find the version we're using of that JAR.
>   

I think this information is still lacking in the jar. I've been 
following the development of Novell ldap classes long time ago and I 
don't remember ever having had information about the release, just the 
delivery date.

>> May I propose to rename it to
>> include the release date and the "origin"? For the updated ldap.jar
>> available at http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/Jldap it could
>> be ldap-novell-20071012.jar.
>>     
>
> Yes definitely. Do you think you could create a jira issue for  
> updating the JAR and attach that jar to the issue (provided the  
> license is still ok to be redistributed in a LGPL software)?
>
>   

Of course.

I'll do that as soon as I understand what this 
fancy-very-small-font-size sentence appearing in the Novell LDAP Classes 
for Java page means!

"Your use of these files is subject to the Novell Developer License 
Agreement 
<http://developer.novell.com/wiki/index.php/Novell_Developer_License_Agreement> 
unless different license terms accompany the file itself, in which case 
those terms govern."

>> I've noted that there is another jar with this syntax,
>> googleapi-UNKNOWN-xwiki.jar. And that other includes what it also  
>> seems
>> a date as proposed for ldap.jar, swizzle-confluence-1.1-20070908- 
>> xwiki.jar.
>>     
>
> Same as above.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>   

Let me put this googleapi item in second position!

Looking to forward to contributing to this great XWiki thing,

Ricardo

-- 
Ricardo Rodríguez
Your XEN ICT Team

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to