Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > 1621 and 299: This hasn't been verified yet (at least I didn't have time > to), and it has been around since the first XWiki release, so I'd say it > is no big deal if it stays unfixed in 1.2.2 > > 1949: Not critical, as deleting versions from the history is not > something usually done. However, if you think it should be included in > 1.2.2, then I can merge it, as the changes were fairly small.
agreed. -- Artem Melentyev _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
