Yes, I am setting the JAVA_HOME variable with DOS prompt and after I set it, I log of and then it is available in the list of env. variables after I log back in. But, when I try to run mvn install, it still gives me the same error.
Also, although, I set the M2_HOMe variable, I am not able to use mvn command without its location! (I have to write the full path of the mvn.bat file and then say install after a space) I dont know what I am doing wrong. Thanks for your replies. On 3/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Send devs mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of devs digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Building Xwiki core (Asiri Rathnayake) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 01:43:58 +0530 > From: "Asiri Rathnayake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] Building Xwiki core > To: "XWiki Developers" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > Did you check whether JAVA_HOME is available in dos prompt as well ? > Perhaps > you should try "set JAVA_HOME=C:\abc\Java\jdk1.5.0_14" prior to running > "mvn > install" ? > > - Asiri > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Kamna Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to learn how to build XWiki from the source. > > > > I checked out the source code in Eclipse 3.3 using Sunclipse and then I > > created a Java Project out of the XWiki Core/src folder. > > Now, I am trying to follow directions from the links - > > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Building > > I downloaded maven-2.1-SNAPSHOT and create dthe .m2/settings.xml. > > I also created M2_HOME varibale and set the PATH variable with M2_HOME. > > Set the JAVA_HOME to the jdk installed on my system. > > > > But, when I try "mvn install" from the directory where I have the > > XWiki/src checked out (Eclipse workspace), it says that JAVA_HOME is not > set > > and gives me the following error: > > > > ERROR: JAVA_HOME not found in your environment. > > Please set the JAVA_HOME variable in your environment to match the > > location of your Java installation > > > > I have JAVA_HOME set and it shows up in the list of env. variables in my > > system like this: > > > > JAVA_HOME = C:\abc\Java\jdk1.5.0_14 > > PATH = C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32;C:\Program > > Files\Subversion\bin;C:\Program Files\TortoiseSVN\bin;C:\Program > Files\Quest > > Software\PuTTY\;C:\Program Files\QuickTime\QTSystem\;C:\Program > Files\Quest > > Software\PuTTY\;%JAVA_HOME%\bin;%M2_HOME%\bin > > > > Could you please tell me what I am doing wrong and what I should change > to > > get this right! > > > > Also, am I on the irght path when I I say I am trying to buildthe src of > > XWiki -core? and nothing else! As an eclipse project, it is all compiled > and > > does not show errors implying that it has all the files that it needs > for it > > to complie. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 3/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Send devs mailing list submissions to > > > [email protected] > > > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > > than "Re: Contents of devs digest..." > > > > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > > > 1. Re: Profiling: Why do attachments require so much memory > > > (Sergiu Dumitriu) > > > 2. [VOTE] Change the attachment archive storage (Sergiu Dumitriu) > > > 3. Re: [VOTE] Change the attachment archive storage (Vincent Massol) > > > 4. Re: [VOTE] Change the attachment archive storage (Sergiu > Dumitriu) > > > 5. [Proposal] XE 1.3 final release date (Vincent Massol) > > > 6. Re: Xwiki Enterprise 1.3 RC1 release date? (Vincent Massol) > > > 7. Re: About GSoC 2008 (Asiri Rathnayake) > > > 8. Re: Xwiki Enterprise 1.3 RC1 release date? (Sergiu Dumitriu) > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Message: 1 > > > Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:28:21 +0100 > > > From: Sergiu Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] Profiling: Why do attachments require so > > > much memory > > > To: XWiki Developers <[email protected]> > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > > > Vincent Massol wrote: > > > > Nice work Sergiu. We should transform this into a jira issue to not > > > > forget it. > > > > > > > > > > We should vote for it first. > > > > > > > One other idea: store attachments on the file system and not in the > > > DB. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > > On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi devs, > > > >> > > > >> Last night I checked what happens when uploading a file, and why > does > > > >> that action require huge amounts of memory. > > > >> > > > >> So, whenever uploading a file, there are several places where the > > > file > > > >> content is loaded into memory: > > > >> - as an XWikiAttachment as byte[] ~= filesize > > > >> - as an XWikiAttachmentArchive as Base64 encoded string ~= > > > >> 2*4*filesize > > > >> - as hibernate tokens that are sent to the database, clones of the > > > >> XWikiAttachment and XWikiAttachmentArchive data ~= 9*filesize > > > >> - as Cached attachments and attachment archive, clones of the same > 2 > > > >> objects ~= 9*filesize > > > >> > > > >> Total: ~27*filesize bytes in memory. > > > >> > > > >> So, out of a 10M file, we get at least 270M of needed memory. > > > >> > > > >> Worse, if this is not the first version of the attachment, then the > > > >> complete attachment history is loaded in memory, so add another > > > >> 24*versionsize*versions of memory needed during upload. > > > >> > > > >> After the upload is done, most of these are cleared, only the > cached > > > >> objects will remain in memory. > > > >> > > > >> However, a problem still remains with the cache. It is a LRU cache > > > >> with > > > >> a fixed capacity, so even if the memory is full, the cached > > > >> attachments > > > >> will not be released. > > > >> > > > >> Things we can improve: > > > >> - Make the cache use References. This will allow cached attachments > > > to > > > >> be removed from memory when there's a need for more memory > > > >> - Do a better attachment archive system. I'm not sure it is a good > > > >> idea > > > >> to have diff-based versioning of attachments. In theory, it saves > > > >> space > > > >> when versions are much alike, but it does not really work in > practice > > > >> because it does a line-diff, and a base64 encoded string does not > > > have > > > >> newlines. What's more, the space gain would be efficient when there > > > >> are > > > >> many versions, as one version alone takes 4 times more space than a > > > >> binary dump of the content. > > > >> > > > >> Suppose we switch to a "one version per table row" for attachment > > > >> history, with direct binary dump, then the memory needed for > > > uploading > > > >> would be 6*filesize, which is much less. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sergiu Dumitriu > > > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Message: 2 > > > Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:34:07 +0100 > > > From: Sergiu Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Change the attachment archive storage > > > To: XWiki Developers <[email protected]> > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > > > Hi devs, > > > > > > As detailed in another mail > > > (http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/2008-February/005344.html), the > > > current attachment archive mechanism is very inefficient. We should > > > write a new one, which stores attachment versions as plain binary > data, > > > and see if the current core is pluggable enough to allow the old > > > mechanism to be preserved as a plugin, and possibly define other > storage > > > mechanisms, like a filesystem based one. > > > > > > Artem, do you think you can help, as this is something related to what > > > you've been working on? > > > -- > > > Sergiu Dumitriu > > > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Message: 3 > > > Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:40:39 +0100 > > > From: Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Change the attachment archive storage > > > To: XWiki Developers <[email protected]> > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > > > > > > > Hi devs, > > > > > > > > As detailed in another mail > > > > (http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/2008-February/005344.html), > the > > > > current attachment archive mechanism is very inefficient. We should > > > > write a new one, which stores attachment versions as plain binary > > > > data, > > > > and see if the current core is pluggable enough to allow the old > > > > mechanism to be preserved as a plugin, and possibly define other > > > > storage > > > > mechanisms, like a filesystem based one. > > > > > > > > Artem, do you think you can help, as this is something related to > what > > > > you've been working on? > > > > > > My only worry is that last time we changed the database format we > > > spent several months stabilizing it... since there were lots of > > > problems. I'm not even sure we've finished stabilizing it fully... > > > > > > So is there any chance that this would be simpler? :) > > > > > > Thanks > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Message: 4 > > > Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:00:12 +0100 > > > From: Sergiu Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Change the attachment archive storage > > > To: XWiki Developers <[email protected]> > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > > > Vincent Massol wrote: > > > > On Mar 3, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi devs, > > > >> > > > >> As detailed in another mail > > > >> (http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/2008-February/005344.html), > > > the > > > >> current attachment archive mechanism is very inefficient. We should > > > >> write a new one, which stores attachment versions as plain binary > > > >> data, > > > >> and see if the current core is pluggable enough to allow the old > > > >> mechanism to be preserved as a plugin, and possibly define other > > > >> storage > > > >> mechanisms, like a filesystem based one. > > > >> > > > >> Artem, do you think you can help, as this is something related to > > > what > > > >> you've been working on? > > > > > > > > My only worry is that last time we changed the database format we > > > > spent several months stabilizing it... since there were lots of > > > > problems. I'm not even sure we've finished stabilizing it fully... > > > > > > > > So is there any chance that this would be simpler? :) > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > > > > It should be simpler, as attachments are just binary blobs, while the > > > XML history is much too fragile. > > > -- > > > Sergiu Dumitriu > > > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Message: 5 > > > Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:18:18 +0100 > > > From: Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XE 1.3 final release date > > > To: XWiki Developers <[email protected]> > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm proposing to revise the 1.3 Final release date to this Friday 7th > > > of March 2007. > > > > > > We've already fixed the major issues raised in 1.3RC1 but I think we > > > need a few days to let people report any issues they might have had > > > with 1.3RC1. > > > > > > Let me know what you think and especially if you don't agree. I'm > > > proposing to do the release. > > > > > > Thanks > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Message: 6 > > > Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:23:39 +0100 > > > From: Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] Xwiki Enterprise 1.3 RC1 release date? > > > To: XWiki Developers <[email protected]> > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > > > > > > On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Everitt, Glenn wrote: > > > > > > > Is the plan to provide a xwiki-enterprise-web1-1.3-rc1.war file on > > > > the Xwiki Download page? When do you think this would be > > > > available? Would it be better to pull it directly from svn? If I > > > > get it from svn how is the RC1 release marked? > > > > > > > It's been released a few days ago... > > > > I noticed that you were looking at using GWT Html editor. Doesn't > > > > GWT Html editor just wrap the FCKEditor? What is the advantage of > > > > using GWT Html Editor instead of just using the FCKEditor? > > > > > > > I have no idea. Anyone knows? > > > > > > Thanks > > > -Vincent > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > > URL: > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/attachments/20080303/66fe6d6b/attachment-0001.htm > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Message: 7 > > > Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 22:57:55 +0530 > > > From: "Asiri Rathnayake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] About GSoC 2008 > > > To: "XWiki Developers" <[email protected]> > > > Message-ID: > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > > > Hi Vincent, > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 2008, at 7:03 AM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 1, 2008, at 3:12 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > Sorry if this is the wrong place / time to ask this question. > > > > > > > > > > I wanted to know whether XWiki will participate in GSoC 2008< > > > http://code.google.com/soc/2008/>. > > > > > ( care to hint some project ideas ? ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > answer is yes! > > > > > > > > > > We all need to think about cool project ideas we want to achieve. > We > > > > > could start by reviewing the leftovers from last year + add some > new > > > ones. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do we have syntax highlighting in XEclipse ? I think this is one of > > > the > > > > leftovers. But I'm not sure whether itself alone be enough for a > > > summer > > > > project. > > > > > > > > > > > > No we don't have it AFAIK. However I don't think it's complex to do > > > since > > > > there's a velocity editor plugin. It should simply be a matter of > > > using it. > > > > As you say this sounds like something a bit too small. However if > you > > > have > > > > other large ideas that you could add with this, then it's worth > > > proposing > > > > them on http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/GoogleSummerOfCode/ > > > > > > > > > > Once i thought it would be nice to have off-line rendering of pages > (no > > > need > > > to be connected to view the results) in XEclipse (is this possible ?). > > > But > > > now I'm wondering if it's worth putting another GSoC project on > XEclipse > > > (?), since fabio seems to be doing a great great great job on XEclipse > > > .... > > > > > > I personally would like to get familiar in core xwiki development (in > > > contrast to add-on development), but i got no idea that would suite a > > > summer > > > project yet :( > > > > > > Hope you (core developers) will put up something cool (and > challenging) > > > soon > > > :) > > > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > > > - Asiri > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > - Asiri > > > > > > > > > > > > > If anyone has cool ideas please send them on this list. I'll > > > organize a > > > > > new space for collating them on xwiki.org in a few days. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > devs mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > > URL: > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/attachments/20080303/a607c282/attachment-0001.htm > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Message: 8 > > > Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:37:24 +0100 > > > From: Sergiu Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] Xwiki Enterprise 1.3 RC1 release date? > > > To: XWiki Developers <[email protected]> > > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > > > Vincent Massol wrote: > > > > > > > > On Feb 27, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Everitt, Glenn wrote: > > > > > > > >> Is the plan to provide a xwiki-enterprise-web1-1.3-rc1.war file on > > > >> the Xwiki Download page? When do you think this would be > available? > > > >> Would it be better to pull it directly from svn? If I get it from > > > svn > > > >> how is the RC1 release marked? > > > >> > > > > It's been released a few days ago... > > > >> > > > >> I noticed that you were looking at using GWT Html editor. Doesn't > > > GWT > > > >> Html editor just wrap the FCKEditor? What is the advantage of > using > > > >> GWT Html Editor instead of just using the FCKEditor? > > > >> > > > > I have no idea. Anyone knows? > > > > > > We're not planning on using an existing GWT editor, but to write our > > > own, so that it is tightly integrated with XWiki. And since it will be > > > written in java, we won't have the current problem with different > > > look/behavior between view, edit in wiki and edit in wysiwyg. > > > > > > And FCK is not suited for XWiki, as it is a HTML editor, and we need a > > > wiki editor. > > > -- > > > Sergiu Dumitriu > > > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > devs mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > > > > > End of devs Digest, Vol 9, Issue 4 > > > ********************************** > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/attachments/20080304/94a83320/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > End of devs Digest, Vol 9, Issue 7 > ********************************** >
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
