Vincent Massol wrote: > On Jun 3, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > >> Tiago Rinck Caveden wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Well, we should not embed an OpenOffice instance in XWiki >>>> products, so >>> >>> Just a humble suggestion, why don't you simply let it embedded in an >>> optional plugin? The user download it if he wants to, and he won't >>> need to >>> do it to have XWiki... >>> It's quite convenient sometimes to have everything packed and >>> configured at >>> one simple download, specially if the user doesn't intend to use >>> this OO >>> runtime for anything else. >>> >> Yes, could be an optional plugin, and a special package (built with a >> different profile). Others also provide installation packages with or >> without JRE, so we can have XE with or without OpenOffice (well, we >> could also provide a package with an included JRE). > > Provided the OO license allows us to redistribute it... > > I'm not sure I understand http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html#10
OpenOffice is LGPL, so we can redistribute it. That FAQ is about StarOffice, which is commercial software. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
