On Jun 4, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

> Vincent Massol wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
>>
>>> vmassol (SVN) wrote:
>>>> Author: vmassol
>>>> Date: 2008-06-03 20:58:01 +0200 (Tue, 03 Jun 2008)
>>>> New Revision: 177
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>> XWIKI-654: Rewrite the Rendering engine
>>>>
>>>> * Renamed Document into DOM. This is a better name and not in
>>>> conflict with the XWiki Document. The other option was to name it
>>>> DocumentAST or AST. Jean-Vincent preferred DOM and I agreed with
>>>> him, although it was a close call ;)
>>> I'm not sure DOM is a good name, as it already stands for something
>>> else.
>>
>> yes I was hesitating a bit because of this but it stand for Document
>> Object Model and it's exactly what this is.
>>
>> Would you prefer AST? What would you suggest?
>
> Well, at W3C DOM is the basic DOM, and after that they make variations
> of *OM. So we could have XDOM (XWiki Document Object Model).

Not bad. What about 
http://www.garshol.priv.no/download/xmltools/prod/ExtDOM.html 
  ? :)

-Vincent

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to