On Jun 4, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > Vincent Massol wrote: >> On Jun 4, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >>> vmassol (SVN) wrote: >>>> Author: vmassol >>>> Date: 2008-06-03 20:58:01 +0200 (Tue, 03 Jun 2008) >>>> New Revision: 177 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> XWIKI-654: Rewrite the Rendering engine >>>> >>>> * Renamed Document into DOM. This is a better name and not in >>>> conflict with the XWiki Document. The other option was to name it >>>> DocumentAST or AST. Jean-Vincent preferred DOM and I agreed with >>>> him, although it was a close call ;) >>> I'm not sure DOM is a good name, as it already stands for something >>> else. >> >> yes I was hesitating a bit because of this but it stand for Document >> Object Model and it's exactly what this is. >> >> Would you prefer AST? What would you suggest? > > Well, at W3C DOM is the basic DOM, and after that they make variations > of *OM. So we could have XDOM (XWiki Document Object Model).
Not bad. What about http://www.garshol.priv.no/download/xmltools/prod/ExtDOM.html ? :) -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs