On Jun 6, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > dare I candidly ask how math is processed?
Is that related to Office/OO import/Export? Do you mean if you put math inside Word documents? If you're talking about math support in general then that's not for this thread... :) I also remember we discussed that several times already too. Maybe you could start a new thread and explain what's your need? Thanks -Vincent > Le 06-juin-08 à 00:34, Mirko Nasato a écrit : > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd certainly be happy to add XWiki to the list of other open source >> projects that use JODConverter and provide suggestions if needed. >> >> I see you mention xhtml... well the OOo xhtml filter is quite limited >> currently. For one it doesn't export embedded images[1]. But it's >> going to >> see big improvements with OOo 3.0. >> >> You may also be interested to know that there's a new major version >> of >> JODConverter[2] in development. >> >> Cheers >> >> Mirko >> >> -- >> [1] http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22012 >> [2] http://jodconverter.wiki.sourceforge.net/v3.0 >> >> >> 2008/6/5 Luis Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> Cool ! I'm glad I could be of help ! Mirko will be happy to know >>> you are >>> working with his code. Putting him on copy. >>> >>> Luis >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Ludovic Dubost >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks Luis, >>>> >>>> This is indeed exactly what we need.. a web service and a java >>>> API at >>>> the same time >>>> Wang you should use this.. expose it as an XWiki plugin with a >>>> configuration option to run embed or connect to an existing web >>>> service. >>>> >>>> My idea is that we ship XWiki configured by default to talk to a >>>> server >>>> that we would host on our platform. >>>> >>>> Ludovic >>>> >>>> Luis Arias wrote: >>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry to pop in, but I imagine you are aware of Mirko's >>>>> JODConverter and >>>>> JODReports: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.artofsolving.com/ >>>>> >>>>> If not I thought it might be useful in the context of your >>>>> discussion. >>>> His >>>>> code is used by Nuxeo, Alfresco, and others and is very simple >>>>> to use. >>>>> JODCOnverter plugs into OO running in server mode. >>>>> >>>>> Good luck, >>>>> Luis >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Vincent Massol >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 8:33 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Vincent Massol wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 4, 2008, at 7:30 PM, Ludovic Dubost wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I agree, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> First you need to package your code as an XWiki plugin that >>>>>>>>> can be >>>>>>>>> called. >>>>>>>>> This plugin should have as many conversion possibilities. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> doc or office -> xhtml >>>>>>>>> xls -> xhtml >>>>>>>>> doc -> openoffice >>>>>>>>> openoffice ->doc >>>>>>>>> doc -> pdf >>>>>>>>> html -> pdf >>>>>>>>> etc.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> hmm not sure. We only need xhtml I think since it's then the >>>>>>>> role of >>>>>>>> the XWiki HTML Parser to generate an internal DOM. Once we >>>>>>>> have that >>>>>>>> DOM we benefit from all the renderers (PDF, XHTML, RTF, >>>>>>>> Latex, etc). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I second Vincent, for the moment the priority is to have wiki >>>>>>> documents. >>>>>>> But then I agree with Ludovic, that it would be better to >>>>>>> convert >>>>>>> attachments to different formats using the OOo codebase. The pdf >>>>>>> export >>>>>>> done now affects only wiki documents, not attachments, and going >>>>>>> through >>>>>>> a long chain of conversions (.doc -> wiki -> xhtml -> xsl-fo - >>>>>>> > pdf) >>>>>>> will only introduce possible problems at each conversion, >>>>>>> while a >>>>>>> direct >>>>>>> conversion doc -> pdf using the (better) OOo code is simpler and >>>>>>> easier. >>>>>>> We can (and should) keep the current PDF export mechanism for >>>>>>> wiki >>>>>>> documents, though. >>>>>>> >>>>>> I think we should make the PDF export a secondary priority and >>>>>> get the >>>>>> rest working for now. Let's revisit it when all the rest is >>>>>> working >>>>>> fine. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Concerning xls I think we should look into having an import >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> does >>>>>>>>> not go through html >>>>>>>>> We might want to write xls to wiki table >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 to this one, too. I think that direct data manipulation >>>>>>> through OOo >>>>>>> is better than reverse-engineering html, and not just for >>>>>>> spreadsheets, >>>>>>> but other types of documents. >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Sergiu Dumitriu >>>>>>> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
