On Jun 21, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Vincent Massol  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jun 20, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
>>> 3) License
>>> ----------------
>>>
>>> * Current : This wiki is licensed under a <a
>>> href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/";>Creative
>>> Commons</a> license
>>> * Proposal : This wiki is licensed under a <a
>>> href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/";>Creative
>>> Commons</a> license
>>
>> +1 but maybe we should say "Creative Commons v3.0" or use this
>> instead: http://tinyurl.com/5jwj8p
>> BTW I've used http://creativecommons.org/license/ to pick the license
>> and it says v2.0 in the end... any idea why is that?
>
> As Artem stated is likely because of the jurisdiction you've picked. I
> guess it's safer to use the v2.0 for now.
> +1 to make visible the version of the license.
>
>>> 4) Version
>>> ----------------
>>
>> What is this version?
>> If it's meant to override the version.properties file then I'd be +1
>> to remove this field altogether since I don't think people should
>> change it easily.
>
> I was going to remove the field when I thought that people may like to
> be able to customize this line easily (to put a product name for
> example) or to put some words about their wiki instead of the xwiki
> version there.

Then I'd prefer a footer text field that replaces the full footer in  
that case or something like this.

Thanks
-Vincent

>>> * Current : empty, actually it's not even taken into account if  
>>> filled
>>> * Proposal : XWiki $xwiki.getVersion() - <a
>>> onclick="openURL('http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Documentation'
>>> ,
>>> '_blank'); return false;"
>>> href="http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
>>> Documentation">Documentation</a>
>>
>> 1) I don't think it's XWiki's version since XWiki doesn't mean much.
>> It should be the product version.
>
> Right, it would be XWiki Enterprise $xwiki.version for XE for example.
>
>> 2) I'm not sure about putting Documentation. I think I'd prefer
>> putting a link to http://xwiki.org with the text "XWiki.org".
>
> Not sure about this one.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to