>
> [snap]
>
> >> 4) Tables: do we keep the table macro or do we want a wiki syntax for
> >> tables.
> >
> > Also need more input.
>
> My take is that we should go with a macro since this allows us to have
> more options like filterable/sortable/pageable/etc than a wiki syntax.
I'm also in favor of keeping a macro for tables. It's less elegant than a
wiki syntax such as Confluence's :
Header || Header || Header
Item | Item | Item
but it provides for more flexibility, and being able to add the parameters
to turn a classic table into a sortable / filterable one would be good.
I have a couple questions about this though : using a wiki macro, how could
one specify which headers should be filtered and which ones shouldn't for
instance ? In HTML code those settings are set at the <th> level, but in a
XWiki macro parameters have to be passed between { & } if I understand
well... What's the solution to this ?
Guillaume
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
