On Aug 19, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2008, at 6:47 PM, Wang Ning wrote:
>
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> AFAIK, the conversion from xhtml to xwiki syntax is hard because many
>> things about how to render the html elements in xwiki syntax are
>> still
>> not sure, like table, img, {style} macro. Furthermore, the
>> xhtmlparser
>> is buggy, like <img> <link> list. I will try my best to make the
>> conversion work, but to make a option, I want develop a feature that
>> just convert office doument to xhtml. So the user can just use the
>> convert2html to get the xhtml and fill xhtml into xwiki page with
>> xwiki syntax 1.0. After we finish the new rendering and the
>> xhtmlparser, the use can change to convert2xwikisyntax.
>> The convert2html is easy but some thing to handle
>> * clean the html (htmlcleaner)
>> * remove the <style> in head (htmlcleaner)
>> * remove empty link (htmlcleaner)
>> * remove <p> in <li> (jdom)
>> * replace <img> with {img} (jdom)
>> * replace link <a> to [] (jdom)
>> * handle the ppt and odp to the single page
>> All these step is easy to implement. The convert2html may be not
>> perfect, but it can work for most conversion requirement for now.
>> As I
>> am runnig for deadline, I think a workable feature is useful.
>> However,
>> I will work on the finial gold "convert to xwiki syntax2.0"
>> continually.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> I agree. Both conversion to XHTML and to wiki syntax should be
> pursued.
One feature we need is some {{office}} macro that will render the
document specified in the document's view.
This feature could be implemented using the XHTML generation for now.
The macro will simply have to generate a {{xhtml}} macro block element
containing the generated XHTML to work.
Then later on when the wiki conversion is working we could simply
remove the {{xhtml}} macro block.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
