On Aug 26, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

> Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to discuss the granularity we want to have for our
>> applications. This discussion was prompted by the recent password-
>> reset application. There are some pros and cons I think of having
>> small applications.
>>
>> Pros:
>> - better compartimentation
>> - different release cycle
>>
>> Cons:
>> - heaviness of release (separate XAR; etc)
>> - different release cycle
>> - fragmentation
>>
>> My personal take is that this application should go under the
>> administration application so that it's released together with it (it
>> could be a sub module that is aggregated in the final XAR for the
>> admin app.).
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> I was thinking about this myself. For me, it isn't exactly
> Administration, as it isn't something admins can do, that's why I
> created a different application.
>
> We could rename the administration application to something more
> generic, and which should have submodules (administration,  
> coreClasses,
> passwordReset).

For me this is definitely an Administrative feature. Administration  
doesn't mean it's only for administrators. It means anything that is  
an administrative feature.

I don't have any better idea on the name right now.

Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to