Hi, [snip] >
> > 3) Special numbered lists > > > > Is it ok to have this syntax: > > > > (% class="roman" %) > > 1. item1 > > 1. item2 > > I prefer this one but... If we use this syntax no user will ever use a roman list. > Or do we introduce new syntax elements as it's done in XWiki Syntax 1.0: > > > > i. item1 > > i. item2 > > I think this is the best for user. +1 if we want users to actually use this feature. > > See http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/XWikiSyntax20#HLists > > for more examples. > > > > I have the feeling it would be better to use our 1.0 syntax for this > > (note that this requires some heavy changes to wikimodel - Will need > > to discuss it with Mikhail). > > What about support both ? Given the fact that support the version with > parameter is not a lot of work anyway if we decide to support the > second. +1 if it's easy to do > > 4) Images > > > > There's currently no special support for images in wikimodel. The > > solution wikimodel proposes is to implement its support through > > linline links. For example: > > > > This is an image:my.png image. > > > > As you can see the image is specified as a URI. > > > > Ok with everyone? > The current macro image gets people confused (among "people" I count myself -> I hardly ever used the parameters available in the macro image). Here again, if we use the "% %" model we need to be aware that most users won't ever input parameters to their images, unless they use the WYSIWYG editor. Since we expect it to work great, that's fine with me, but I simply want us to be aware that doing this we make the XWiki syntax at least as complex as HTML, which basically removes its interest as a simplified markup. > [snip] > Guillaume -- Guillaume Lerouge Product Manager - XWiki Skype ID : wikibc http://blog.xwiki.com/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
