Vincent Massol wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2008, at 5:07 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> 
>> Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Vincent Massol  
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Guillaume was surprised (and rightly so) that we use this format for
>>>> nested lists:
>>>>
>>>> 111*.
>>>>
>>>> He was expecting 111.*
>> How come?
>>
>>>> I remember I had the same remark the first time I saw this a long  
>>>> time
>>>> ago.
>>>>
>>>> Thus (if we agree) we have 2 solutions:
>>>>
>>>> Solution 1:
>>>> =========
>>>>
>>>> 111.*
>> -0.5, for me at least it is not intuitive at all.
>>
>>>> Solution 2:
>>>> ========
>>>>
>>>> 1.1.1.*
>> +0.25
>> A bit too long.
>>
>>> I'm in favor of this solution since it follows the usual pattern  
>>> for lists :
>>>
>>> *
>>> **
>>>
>>> 1.
>>> 1.1.
>>>
>> We could also have a simple dotless 1, like:
>>
>> 1 list item
>> 1* subitem
>> 1* subitem
>> 1*1 numbered subitem
>> 1*1 numbered subitem
>>
>> Of course this means that any non-list 1 at the start of the row  
>> should
>> be escaped. Also, it is confusing with the old header syntax.
> 
> Yes that's the reason I didn't list it.
> 
>> If the dot's placement is not clear enough, we could use ), like:
>>
>> 1) item
>> 1*) subitemitem
>> 111) etc
> 
> This sounds too different from other syntaxes ( http://www​ 
> .wikimatri​x.org/synt​ax.php?i=3​3).
> 
> So are you saying that the current notation ("1111*.") is ok for you?

Of all the choices, it seems to be the least bad one.

> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 
>>> thus making it easier for users to remember : indent one level =  
>>> duplicate
>>> the symbol .
>>>
>>> Guillaume
>>>
>>>
>>>> Another solution would be to use another symbol but we cannot use #
>>>> and the second most common solution is "1."
>>>> See http://www​.wikimatri​x.org/synt​ax.php?i=3​3
>>>>
>>>> I'm hesitating but I propose to use Solution 2 which seems the most
>>>> consistent to me.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>


-- 
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to