Hi Vincent, Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi, > > I had proposed to use the ^ character as attachment delimiter. > Ex: wiki:Space.Page^attachment > > However I've just realized while implementing it that it's an "unwise" > character in an URI > (source: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt) > > unwise = "{" | "}" | "|" | "\" | "^" | "[" | "]" | "`" > > Allowed punctuations characters are: > > mark = "-" | "_" | "." | "!" | "~" | "*" | "'" | "(" | ")" > > BTW the following are reserved: > reserved = ";" | "/" | "?" | ":" | "@" | "&" | "=" | "+" | "$" | "," > > Note that we use ":" for wiki delimiter but that's okay since we're > using an opaque URI and thus reserved chars, unreserved chars and > escaped chars are authorized. > > I think it would be better to choose amongst one the valid chars for > the attachment to prevent future problems. > > Of course this means we'll have to make that character forbidden in a > page name. Actually we could also decide that it's character forbidden > in an attachment (and use lastIndexOf() instead of indexOf() to > separate the page name from the attachment name). Or we could double > it once again... > > I propose we use the @ symbol since it's not a char used often in page > names.
+0 > > For example: > attach:wiki:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This raises the discussion of the full FQN we'd like to have when we > support nested spaces too. For example: > > (wiki name) "::" (space name) [ "." (space name)]* "::" (page name) > ["@" (attachment name)]? > > Now what about referencing objects and properties using a URI too? Do > we want that? What would be the use? Right now I don't see a use and > using an API to access them seems fine to me. I don't have a use case too, but I fill this would be very useful at some point. It's a good thing to be able to reference any part of our model. I'm +1 for it. > > Alternative view > ============ > > We could also only specify the attachment name in the uri and use link > parameters to specify the document where it's located as in: > > [[image:my.png>>document="wiki:Space.Page"]] > > This sounds reasonable to me too. I think the real question is whether > we need a textual representation of an attachment FQN or not. By using link parameters we won't be able to use the short form attach:wiki:[EMAIL PROTECTED] right? > > WDYT? > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
