On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Oct 31, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Jerome Velociter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Vincent Massol wrote: > >>> On Oct 30, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Jerome Velociter > >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> Florin Ciubotaru wrote: > >>>>>> Hi devs, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We need to create a jira project for the MS Office integration. > >>>>>> Jerome > >>>>>> has proposed to put in "XWiki Core & Products" section, with the > >>>>>> "*XOFFICE*" key. WDYT? > >>>>> I'm thinking about the Office integration as we have today the > >>>>> Eclipse > >>>>> integration, thus the idea of the XOffice key. > >>>>> > >>>>> A question remain : should the office importer project also be > >>>>> part > >>>>> of > >>>>> the Office integration JIRA project ? I think it's ok for now, it > >>>>> could > >>>>> be a component of the project, as the microsoft addin would be. If > >>>>> it's > >>>>> not ok, then XOFFICE might not be the best name, it should then > >>>>> reflect > >>>>> the MS Office suite. XMSOFFICE ? > >>>> > >>>> I think they should both be part of the same project, separated as > >>>> JIRA > >>>> components, so keeping XOFFICE is fine with me. > >>> > >>> No. that's not possible and not the way to do it in JIRA. > >>> > >>> Remember that one jira project = same version = same release. > >> Ah, right. And releasing them as a whole will not be really > >> possible I > >> guess. As well we will surely have distinct releases for word > >> integration and eventual outlook or other MS office integration. > >> Thus we > >> should have separated JIRA project for each product of the suite. > >> > >> What do you think about the following : > >> > >> * XWORD => MS Word integration > >> * XPOFFICE => Office importer plugin > >> > > > > I think office importer should have the XOFFICE code name. Because > > office-importer surpasses all office suits (MsOffice, OpenOffice, > > StarOffice) and formats. > > XP means XWiki Plugin... > > However it's not just a plugin but an application and for now we've > decided to have only 1 JIRA project for both application and plugin so > it should be XAOFFICE instead... ;) Sounds good :) Thanks. - Asiri > > > Thanks > -Vincent > > >> > >> Concerning the XWiki .net assembly, I don't have much idea. XDOTNET ? > >> > >> Jerome. > >> > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -Vincent > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> The first Add-in in the suite will be the Word Add-in and is > >>>>>> currently > >>>>>> named *XWriter*( XWord is another option). > >>>>> I think XWord is a better name, it let us the possibility to have > >>>>> XWriter for a future possible OOo integration. > >>>> > >>>> +1 for XWord for MSWord and thus XWriter for OOo Writer at a later > >>>> stage. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> I target the first milestone > >>>>>> release on November 19th, and a first final version somewhere > >>>>>> around XE > >>>>>> 1.8 final release date. > >>>>> FYI, the features targeted for the first final versions are > >>>>> described > >>>>> here : > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/MicrosoftOfficeAddin#HFirstversion > >>>>> . > >>>>> Namely : > >>>>> " > >>>>> * Users will be able to create a new wiki page from Office(Word > >>>>> works as an WYSIWYG using WebView to directly create HTML) > >>>>> * Users can upload a local document to the wiki, as an attachment > >>>>> * Users can export a local file as a wiki page. > >>>>> " > >>>>> > >>>>> XE 1.8 should happen somewhere around the end of February 2009. > >>>>> Now > >>>>> you > >>>>> should propose a breakdown of the features in this roadmap for the > >>>>> 1.0 > >>>>> version in several milestones. I think 3 milestones of 3/4 weeks > >>>>> each is > >>>>> good for the 1.0 cycle - keeping in mind we want to be able to > >>>>> ship > >>>>> it > >>>>> with XE 1.8 (this way, remains 3/4 weeks for debugging in releases > >>>>> candidates phases) and keeping in mind too that you are working > >>>>> only 50% > >>>>> of your time on this project. > >>>>>> The solution also contains a project named *XWikiLib*. This is an > >>>>>> assembly that will contain most logic for the server connection > >>>>>> and > >>>>>> other utilities. It might be useful for other members of the > >>>>>> community > >>>>>> that may want to connect to XWiki from a .NET client. > >>>>> This assembly should live in its own project, right ? It source > >>>>> code > >>>>> should also be separated from the actual office integration (the > >>>>> add-in). > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Jerome. > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Florin Ciubotaru > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
