You mean a developer renaming a key ? Well the only way for this to be handled by the tool would be to have the developer declare the key name is being changed. This could be done but would need to be done in the tool, not in the initial bundle.
Ludovic Paul Libbrecht wrote: > Careful, > > I really meant give flexibility for developers to move around sections > of bundles... of course without translators re-translating. That > doesn't seem to be taken care of. > > One bad experience which made us completely disqualify 99translations > which, I think, is similar to most only tools is the absence of > sections and comments... e.g. "these phrases appear in this UI". This > is really crucial! > > paul > > > Le 04-nov.-08 à 01:23, Ludovic Dubost a écrit : > >> I think this is taken into account by the tool. When versions x was >> already translated and validated, the tool says translations are up >> to date. >> When version x+1 is done, the main language files are reloaded in the >> tool. At this point, the tool will point out: >> >> - all empty translations (new strings) >> - all keys that have the main language text that has changed from the >> previous version >> >> The translator can work on these on the online site. >> >> In the online tool approach, the online tool is the master for all >> translations. Nobody shoud work directly on translations bundles. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Ludovic Dubost Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
