Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi Lucien and all, > > Several ideas: > > 1) If this were implemented at the xwiki syntax level we couldn't do > it with a macro as this would break the semantic of the wiki but it > could be done using semantic inline poroperties > (http://code.google.com/p/wikimodel/wiki/AdvancedStructuralElements > ). Note that we haven't implemented this yet in the rendering. Right > now the closest would be using custom XHTML attributes. > 2) If it were to be implemented at the level of the wiki syntax it > would only work with XWiki syntax 2.0 since we don't have a XHTML to > wiki syntax converter for the 1.0 syntax (there would be too many > other problems too) > 3) You must talk to Marius and reuse his Range and Selection API that > he implemented for Firefox/IE for selecting portions of text
Take a look here http://tinyurl.com/58u4ws . If you have questions please ask. Regards, Marius > 4) I agree that it would be easier implemented at the xwiki syntax as > otherwise you would have a very hard time synchronizing document > changes with text selections. In addition having it at the wiki syntax > allows to enter annotations when editing the document using the > wysiwyg editor or the wiki editor and it solves the way to persist the > location information. > > So, is 2) acceptable for your need Lucien? > > If we agree that it's best to implement at the wiki syntax level then > we'll need to wait for 1.8 since we'll need to introduce semantic > properties in the rendering module. > > This is an interesting use case ;) > > Thanks > -Vincent > > On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Lucien PEREIRA wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to propose this design >> <http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/AnnotationFeature> for >> annotation feature implementation. >> >> Vote is about choosing between solution 1 and 2. >> >> if we can have an (almost) perfect bijective function between HTML and >> XWiki code, I'm +1 for solution 2 because implementation will be more >> efficient , stable and clean. >> Otherwise solution 1 seems to be a good solution. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Lucien > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
