Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
>> Note that I don't know what are the REST best practices. I'm jut
>> noticing the inconsistency.
>>
>
> Ok. I saw what you meant.
> I modified a bit the resources to remove the inconsistency.
> I did this because attachments have also their own versioning.
> So you can access a specific version of an attachment either by
> requesting an attachment at a given page version
> or by requesting an specific version of an attachment.
>
> To be consistent I only left the resources for referring to an
> attachment starting for a given page version:
>
> /space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments
> /space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}
> /space/{space}/pages/{page}/{version}/attachments/
> /space/{space}/pages/{page}/{version}/attachments/{attachment}
>
> I still maintained the non-verbose version but that can be changed if
> there is not an agreement on it.
>
>
> However it might be still useful to expose attachment resources by using
> their own versioning:
>
> /space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/history
> /space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/{version}
+1 for both (verbose):
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/history/{version}/attachments/{attachment}
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/history/{version}
But this should not work:
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/history/{version}/attachments/{attachment}/history/{version}
Since we either want to see all the versions of the attachment, or the
attachment variant used in a certain version of the document.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
