On Dec 17, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Dec 17, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Dec 17, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Lucien PEREIRA wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Working on annotation feature, I need to retrieve >>>>> xwiki document source code from a selection on XHTML. >>>>> >>>>> This requires to have a correspondence between content >>>>> typed by user and content that appears in html. >>>>> >>>>> I noticed in xwiki 2.0 synthax that white spaces typed >>>>> in a list item context are ignored : >>>>> >>>>> *< >>>>> space >>>>>> >>>>> < >>>>> space >>>>>> < >>>>>> space >>>>>>> <space><space>foo<space><space><space>bar<space><space><space> >>>>> >>>>> renders in XHTML >>>>> >>>>> <li>foo<space> bar </li> >>>>> >>>>> so I could not determine the real offset of selection in xwiki >>>>> document source. >>>> >>>> There's another problem: leading spaces before list items and >>>> headers. >>>> We need to allow them (for several reasons, one of them is for >>>> supporting indenting velocity code when we have velocity mixed with >>>> wiki syntax). So in term of rendering they should be considered >>>> as a >>>> ListItemBlock and the spaces should not be rendered. >>>> >>>> One problem is when we go through the wysiwyg these spaces will be >>>> removed. Removing them for content not in macros is not such a big >>>> deal IMO (except for Lucien's use case but there are other ways of >>>> doing it for him). Removing them would be a problem when inside >>>> macros. Fortunately we don't touch at macro content for the moment. >>>> >>>>> This can be solved by not ignoring spaces so render become : >>>>> >>>>> < >>>>> li >>>>>> >>>>>   >>>>> ;  >>>>> ; foo<space> bar </ >>>>> li> >>>>> >>>>> This policy of rendering already exists in underline or italic >>>>> context so it's strange to have a different behaviour in list >>>>> item context. >>>>> >>>>> Moreover I think we should not suppose what content is >>>>> relevant for user or not, so source shouldn't be altered. >>>> >>>> We have to alter source in the case of badly formed content, as in >>>> "**bold". We also later for unisignificant escapes (as with >>>> "~hello"' >>>> is transformed into "hello") + some other use cases probably. >>>> >>>> Right now I don't have any idea of what to do differently. Only >>>> idea I >>>> could think of would be to have a parameter for list items and >>>> headers, passing to them the number of leading spaces, tabs, etc >>>> but I >>>> don't like this too much. >>>> >>>> I think the idea of leaving the content intact is not correct and >>>> we >>>> shouldn't expect that behavior for a wiki syntax. A wiki syntax >>>> needs >>>> to be as simple as possible for users to use. Allowing leading >>>> spaces >>>> go in that direction. OTOH I agree with Lucien that we've decided >>>> to >>>> make spaces in paragraph significant so it's not fully consistent. >>>> >>>> What do others think? >>> >>> I agree that it's not alway possible to respect the original source >>> especially with useless escapes (~toto which become toto). >>> >>> Now in the case of list item content I think we should support it >>> because it's exactly the same context that space in a paragraph and >>> such so it have to behave the same way for consistency. >>> >>> So +1 to support spaces at beginning of list item. >> >> Could you explain what you mean by "support spaces at begining of >> list >> item"? > > Yes it's not very clear: +1 for not removing first spaces of list item > content. In other words +1 for changing the current behavior.
This is still not clear. If we don't remove leading spaces is it still a list item? And if it's still a list item how do we implement this since lists are block elements? And what about spaces after the first space after the list item delimiters? Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
